How Cosmo Changed the World

Sex & Romance 1889 Hits > 2010-05-30 18:42:42


Cosmo
How Cosmo Changed the World

If you're like most of our readers, you can't wait to tear into Cosmo every month, eager for tips on everything from having great sex to scoring your dream job. Oh, let's just say it: Cosmo's your bible! But have you ever wondered the way it all began?




The story of how a '60s babe named Helen Gurley Brown (you've probably heard of her) transformed an antiquated general-interest mag called Cosmopolitan into the must-read for young, sexy single chicks is pretty damn amazing — and so is the effect her creation has had on the world. Over the years, Cosmo has not only become the number-one-selling monthly magazine on the newsstand, but it has also served as an agent for social change, encouraging women everywhere to go after what they want (whether it be in the boardroom or the bedroom).




Birth of the Cosmo Girl



Back in the '60s, young, single women were enjoying a new level of freedom. For the first time, they were beginning to bust their butts in formerly male-dominated fields and explore premarital sex. But the phenomenon was still so new that nobody was really talking about it — at least not in public. Although these forward-thinking women were definitely enjoying themselves, there was a small part of them that needed to know they weren't alone.




Enter Helen Gurley Brown. In 1962, the just-married copywriter penned Sex and the Single Girl, a fictional book about a swinging singleton who was leading this new kind of life. Not only did the book tell women they didn't need a man to be happy, but it also encouraged them to enjoy sex with whomever they damn well pleased — without guilt. Those two messages struck a chord: Helen's book was an instant best-seller, and unattached girls everywhere were so psyched that someone had finally spoken to them, they flooded her with thank-you notes — and begged her for personal advice.




Helen realized that if she had her own magazine, she could answer all of these women at once, so she mapped out a proposal that explored her book's main messages. "I knew that women were having sex and loving it," she says. "I wanted my magazine to be their best friend, a platform from which I could tell them what I'd learned and talk about all the things that hadn't been discussed before. I wanted to tell the truth: that sex is one of the three best things out there, and I don't even know what the other two are."




As soon as the mock-up was finished, she started shopping it around New York publishing companies. Rejection followed rejection, until Helen met with people at the Hearst company. "Cosmopolitan — their old general-interest publication for men and women — was hemorrhaging money," she says. "They had been planning to just close it down but instead agreed to give it to me and let me try out my new format."




Breaking New Ground



The first issue to totally reflect Helen's vision was September 1965, but the July '65 issue was the first she edited. "It had a piece about the Pill, which was still new and hadn't really been written about before," she says. "To me, the most important thing about it was that if you weren't worried about getting pregnant, you could enjoy yourself more in bed. So we wrote a cover line to that effect." When women saw the line — "The new pill that makes women more responsive" — they knew exactly what Cosmo was talking about and snatched the issue off newsstands in droves.




From then on, the magazine continued to push the envelope with articles on provocative (and often taboo) topics like man-meeting vacations and extramarital affairs. Soon it had a huge — and fiercely loyal — readership.




"Cosmo was so popular, libraries couldn't keep it around — women kept stealing the issues," says Laurie Ouellette, PhD, assistant professor of media studies at Queens College and author of "Inventing the Cosmo Girl," a 1999 article that looked at the cultural impact of the magazine in the '60s and '70s. "What made it so desirable is that it outlined an American dream for single, working women. It provided them with a vision and detailed advice on how to live a better life — on their own terms."




"Cosmopolitan put female sexuality right out there on the front page, where everyone could see it at the grocery store," adds Janna L. Kim, PhD, postdoctoral research fellow at the Center for Research on Gender and Sexuality at San Francisco State University. "People could no longer pretend that it didn't exist."




Fun Fearless Feminism



While the revamped Cosmo was flying off the stands, the mag's empowering message was rubbing many men — and even a few women — the wrong way."All of a sudden, there was this mass female audience out there that some people found threatening," says Ouellette. "These girls were sexually liberated and independent and infringing on territories that had previously been reserved for men. Many of Cosmo's opponents were saying 'Who the hell do these women think they are?'"




And it wasn't just prudes and conservatives who took issue with the mag: A number of hard-core feminists were anti-Cosmo as well. "They felt that the magazine's emphasis on beauty and man pleasing didn't jibe with their own message of sisterhood and independence," says Julie Berebitsky, PhD, professor of women's studies and history at Sewanee: The University of the South.




What they didn't seem to realize was, Cosmo's gentler brand of feminism was more realistic and palatable." Cosmo is feminist in that we believe women are just as smart and capable as men are and can achieve anything men can," says Helen. "But it also acknowledges that while work is important, men are too. The Cosmo girl absolutely loves men!"




She also loves having a smokin' hot sex life. "Over the years, the magazine has consistently given women permission to steer their own sexuality," says Joyce Brothers, PhD, renowned psychologist and syndicated columnist for Parade magazine. "It empowered them by giving them the confidence to take the lead in relationships and in bed."




In fact, according to a study done by Kim, women who read Cosmo for sex advice are more likely to believe that women should take charge of their own sexual pleasure; readers are also more likely to believe that women should be strong, assertive, and speak their minds. "I found that the more often a woman reads Cosmo, the less likely she is to censor herself or act in ways that are inconsistent with how she feels," says Kim.




Who could wish for a better legacy than that? We here at Cosmo are happy to have played such a significant part in women's history, and we look forward to many more years of empowering chicks everywhere.

Comments

dude Erikkson says:

Posted 611 days ago ? are we sure that cosmo doesn't reflect mostly patriarchy? yeah sure sexuality is attractive, but who doubts its existence except hard core christian conservatives? this mag seems like a shout out for howard stern fans, and girls who feel that they must jibe with that paradigm. let those guys know what you want, but maybe most aren't really doubting that, it just gets too full of socially flaunting the ability to personally objectify oneself to reaffirm trophy status for your self and the dudes out there who grade women. lots of how to fulfill men and be obsessive about insecurities that may not matter as much if they weren't made from molehills into mountains. Helen Brown wrote that book about getting sex and not caring about love so much , but has anyone heard of R.D. Laing? This mag sounds a little to much like that ideology. This is the viewpoint of some men, plagued with anxieties about appearing to not care about women and posing as invulnerable to emotions , and that is what Helen Brown seems to have reacted to in her book. But this is a right wing type of man, and you see lots of them not jiving well with this way of living. Is dating Chad Kroeger good enough for Cosmo readers or do women need to read about more realistic issues than simply loudly proclaiming a woman's ability to please men sexually. Its there, no doubt, but that point drown out equality of the minds. What does having sex with Mick Jagger and not caring to love him (because we know he doesn't respect women) do for a woman? I know men are given their own masculine stereotypes like the marlboro man who doesn't talk about what he feels or thinks about but times change and lots of men are looking for women who can help them (mutually) understand what it means to care in relationships, that men need moral support from women saying they are in fact looking for something more textural to relationships than the one issue of having sex. This mag seems like it has been beaten down by a right wing conception of maleness and is responding to it, finding a way to work with it by saying this is all men, but this isn't what a man really is, and convincing readers that all men are this way just reinforces a vicious cycle. You think you're not going to have sex with a dude by talking about other things? get real! We should know by now that tricks to get a man work for tricksters and dudes with character flaws who are trying to please other dudes by saying 'I too am a simple tough guy who must reaffirm he only cares about having sex with women and not valuing other facets about them' but its a kind of social peer pressure to conform and not who we really are, and you see a lot of men frustrated about fitting this norm of being uncaring about women and themselves too since I think underneath the postures you have men who want to be allowed to care about women but the macho ideology has too many anxieties before being able to confirm that aspiration. Sure men and women love each other, but that love and understanding each other has to be real and not based on tricks similar to the PUA community that is the counterpart to a lot of what cosmo writes about. Sure, people may think I'm smart, but when some dude representing patriarchy says likewise I ponder about his intentions and that maybe its because I look like a standard dude from pushups or whatever. Likewise, for women, when someone say you're confident and fearless or whatever, ask who is saying this and do they interpret the same as you might?


Submit a Comment

Name

E-Mail

Rate this Article:

comment Comment
 

Related Posts